2.27.2006

Insight: Cheney To Retire After 2006 Elections...

Hopefully because the democrats will be in power and will impeach him. LINK

Story the conservative mag Insight, which lists Michele Malkin as one of its 'sites to watch.' I had always thought MiMa was on the fringe, and checked on technorati - no, she's a top 10 blog.

What is this country coming to?

2.23.2006

That took about five minutes.

1/31/06: Samuel Alito Sworn In As 110th Supreme Court Justice

2/23/06: S. Dakota to ban abortion

Big in Japan

I've been doing a little flashmob retrospective.

June 19th, 2003: An Agent Smith flashmob. Clever.

I wish I knew how to quit you...


Its not like they come out with half-Samoan Barbie.

but even if they did?

I would still totally want Galadriel Barbie.

She's so... white.

Reason #234,523.5b.II.xiv to ride MARTA...












Car belonging to Ruth Levy, democratic candidate for State Senate, District 32.

I know this is, like, my 8th post today. I so don't want to be at work...

More about Harpers

This is utterly odd.

Harpers seems to have wiki-fied its entire site, under the main category 'Connections,' which links between people, places, things, and ideas. Literally. Heres the list of links: Sources, Human Beings, Human Endeavor, Human Attributes, Human Needs, Ideas, Supernatural Beings, Nature, Geopolitical Regions, Organizations & Bureaucracies.

A few clicks in, you find yourself at a page as odd as this:

Entities at War

Directory of Entities at War

  1. Palestine
    1. Israel
  2. Satan
    1. Allah
    2. God
    3. Jesus Christ
    4. Muhammad
  3. United States of America
    1. Afghanistan
    2. Drugs
    3. Iraq
    4. Terrorism
This is Entities at War, a concept related to nationalism. It is part of Nationalism, which is part of Ideas, which is part of Connections, which is part of Harpers.org.

Navigate by Hierarchy
Prev: [First in section]
Next: Countries
Up: Nationalism

Permanent URL
http://harpers.org/AtWar.html

Too, too weird.

Human Subjects

what the...

Flash mobs were invented by Bill Wasik, Sr. editor of Harpers, as part of a social experiement?

hat tip Gawker.

grrrrrrrr..........

2.22.2006

Power law distribution

I recently did a non-formal lit review of writing about internet discussion boards. I found that most of the scholarly writing is practical application research in 3 categories:
  1. Healthcare: do online forums help educate patients and thereby impact care.. can you deliver preventative care over the internet
  2. Education: effective uses of tech in education
  3. Poly Sci: political ramifications (change party/issue organizition, affect patterns in civic discourse, impact voting patterns)

Within each of these theres a subsection of 'the medium is the message' type stuff where you can look at the tech determinants of a medium or forum (text based, no login, light moderator presence) and comment on the type of dialogues that creates and prevents.

Strictly theoretical writing on the internet - by people who are merely curious about the nature of these types of forums who aren't looking for practical applications - are rarer (Its official: hypertext is dead!) Most of the theoretical writing is closely related to the practical application people, and covers...

  1. effects of structural components: eg. the blurring of geographic, written/spoken, public/private and the real/the virtual boundaries
  2. behaviors: ‘hostility’, ‘self-presentation’ and ‘support’.

Yesterday I saw a funny article falling into this last genre by Ignatius from WaPo. Connectedness and conflict has gotten a lot of play in the blogosphere, probably in part because it cites Fukayama's recent break with neo-con foreign policy. Its one of two articles I've read recently that use a materialist(?) argument for why the internet spreads inequality. Ignatius writes...
[Raja Sidawi] argues that Barnett misses the fact that as elites around the world become more connected with the global economy, they become more disconnected from their own cultures and political systems. The local elites "lose touch with what's going on around them," opening up a vacuum that is filled by religious parties and sectarian groups, Sidawi contends. The modernizers think they are plugging their nations into the global economy, but what's also happening is that they are unplugging themselves politically at home.
I guess the unspoken assumption is that only the local elites have access to the internet - thus participation in the globalized economy is simply another mark of class divisions. Ignatius follows up by citing another trend in internet theory - that the medium implicitly enhances certain behaviours, namely, rage - by decontextualizing events, images, etc., and enhancing proximity.

Interesting, but nothing new. There are a million different examples I could give to break down this theory - that the internet sows discord and inequality, rather than acting as an equalizing force, but I won't. Instead, I'll add a little social network theory to further Ignatius's claims.

The other article I read was about the A-list blogs. And if I could find it, I would link it, but I can't, so here's this. Basically, it looks at the graph of blog traffic, or blog links - which follows a power-law distribution, and explains this finding with social network theory.

Now, thanks to a series of breakthroughs in network theory by researchers like Albert-Laszlo Barabasi, Duncan Watts, and Bernardo Huberman among others, breakthroughs being described in books like Linked, Six Degrees, and The Laws of the Web, we know that power law distributions tend to arise in social systems where many people express their preferences among many options. We also know that as the number of options rise, the curve becomes more extreme. This is a counter-intuitive finding - most of us would expect a rising number of choices to flatten the curve, but in fact, increasing the size of the system increases the gap between the #1 spot and the median spot.
So, popular blogs like TalkingPointsMemo become more popular, and unpopular blogs (like mine) stay where they are.

My conclusion unfortunately is completely borrowed from BIB's dis, and I don't want to give away his ideas and have people STEAL them. So I guess I'll sit on that until the damn book is published.

Ciao,

- Ms. Bling

Not anymore.


2.21.2006

the Ring

random news of the day...

David Irving was sentenced over the weekend for denying the holocaust. Hard to know where to fall on this one, but I guess I'm for.Over at the corner on NRO, they're also split - I guess juxtaposed against the cartoon controversy, theres some concern about even-handedness re: free speech and offensiveness... I don't know. BIBs mentioned a bit about the trial, in which Irving sued Emory prof Deborah Lipstadt for libel after she called him a ... liar?

In a matter of weeks, Nicholas Kristoff raised 727K to send Bill O'Reilly to Darfur... which is kind of funny and definitely printworthy, but in the end, like most of Kristoff's pet projects, just another egotistical, dubious waste of money. Some people - O'Reilly is one- you just have to accept as they are - theres no formula to say x dollars and y life experiences equals z George Wallace conversions.

My friend MomZilla just started a blog - I'm a fan. She's a very wise lady, who's lived in the ATL for much longer than me, has married and joined a church and raised a child and bought a house here - just has a deeper interaction with the city and what this place is all about.

And O-Lo just came and left for a visit. Unfortunately me and BIB were sick, sick, sick the whole time. Still it was lovely seeing her - its been too long.

OK. Back to work.

2.16.2006

I don't know why she swallowed a fly. Perhaps she'll die.

So Cheney poured the fragments of his heart out to Brit Hume on Fox News last night...

"I fired, and there's Harry falling. It was, I'd have to say, one of the worst days of my life at that moment."

"I'm the guy who pulled the trigger that fired the round that hit Harry."

"The image of him falling is something I'll never ever be able to get out of my mind,"

Yes, this is how guns work. You fire, the other guy falls, you get really upset and feel bad. I guess Cheney never went to war, so this is his only experience in first-hand violence.

And what an experience! Cheney utters the classic distancing statements. "I fired and there's Harry falling," he says. The shooting and the falling are simultaneous, disconnected events. You can supply your own assumptions about cause and effect - or not, if you're Brit Hume. But Cheney won't make that leap and bring himself to say, "I shot Harry."

And what about that "shooting"? Well, first off, Cheney's not the shooter. "The guy who" substitutes in for our vice president before any of the action occurs. And get this straight: the-guy-who is our Vice President doesn't actually "shoot" his friend. The-guy-who just "pulled the trigger that fired the round." Then the round hit Harry.

So I guess Cheney - I mean the-guy-who - doesn't actually shoot people. Cheney pulls the $8,000 28 guage shotgun trigger. The trigger fires rounds, and the rounds hit people.

And when the rounds hit people the people fall and make a lovely recurring image in Cheney's mind. One might call it a "flashback"? You might want to see a therapist for that PTSD, Dick. Or Oprah. I hear she did wonders for James Frey.

Ahhh, the terrible emotional toll of hunting accidents. Let us all shed a tear for the traumatizing experience the-guy-who is Dick Cheney must have had. And don't forget the shotgun round! The shotgun round actually performed the hitting of Harry. Poor, poor shotgun round hitting Harry.

You know what I'm thinking? The-guy-who is a big fucking pussy. Cheney's a real man. A-real-man-who uttered an order. The order made an Army move lots of troops to Iraq. Then thousands of people had their own worst days, day after day. Some of them have pictures in their heads too, that won't go away.

But the-guy-who gets involved in a stupid hunting accident with an $8,000 shotgun on a millionnaires ranch, and suddenly finds himself with an image of a man falling down coming up again and again like the waking nightmare of his last remnant of human concern.

In other news, its a gorgeous day. O-lo showed up last night, she's taking her USMLE part XXVILC-b3 right now. Hope she knocks em dead... errr, I mean correctly diagnoses all her patients in perfect English with a compassionate but professional bedside manner. We had a funny discussion of professional patients last night -they're sort of the nude models of the medical world. They get so good at knowing what it feels like when you probe their ovaries/prostate gland/whatever correctly that they will guide your hands and give you encouragement when you finally perform a rectal exam correctly. Ewww. Reminds me of Millie the talking cow in The Restaurant at the End of the Universe.

The lefties are calling MARTA racist - and I guess they've got it wrong - its the suburban counties that refuse to participate in MARTA that are racist. I have to say, I love MARTA. Why? Let me count the ways...
1. They're reliable and one of the few community public spaces in this historically torn apart, conservative, compartmentalized city.
2. Every passenger thanks the bus driver as they get off the bus - and occasionally the driver will respond with something like, 'have a blessed day."
3. When Rosa Parks died, every MARTA bus put 'Thank you Mrs. Rosa Parks' on the lighted marquee above the windshield'
4. They have polar bear and penguin shorts on the MARTA TV. Someday I dream of being a MARTA TV celebrity.
5. I can put my bike on the bus.

So the boy is sick and slightly feverish. He was very cute last night, all cold and needed a human blanket. The weather is absolutely gorgeous and I'm feeling spring feverish myself - warm weather demands some emotional release, and I feel like crying with relief.

Ciao,

Ms. Bling

2.15.2006

Cheney's got a Gun Day 5

Funniest question:
Courtesy NYTimes Dining and Wine Section "Diners Journal by Frank Bruni":

Dear Mr. Bruni,
I find it valuable that you were reporting from the White House.
Are they canibals? Being now a restaurant critic you could throw some lite also on the background of policy making.

Comment by Pincas Jawetz — February 15, 2006 @ 6:26 am

Tabloidest spin:
courtesy HuffPo:

The real story is already emerging, if you're willing to do a little digging. Cheney and Whittington went hunting with two women (not their wives), there was some drinking, and Whittington wound up shot. Armstrong didn't see the incident but claimed she had, Cheney refused to be questioned by the Sheriff until the next morning, and a born-again evangelical physician has been downplaying Whittington's injuries since they occurrred.
Now I gotta know: whats up with the (so far) silent 'third hunter,' US Ambassador to Switzerland, Pamela Willeford? And does Lynn know?

Key observation:

Courtesy kos:

Armstrong said she saw Cheney's security detail running toward the scene. "The first thing that crossed my mind was he had a heart problem," she told The Associated Press.
In other words, she didn't see the accident. All of her statements, replete with colorful sidebars about getting "peppered pretty good," gave the false impression she was an eyewitness. She wasn't.
Worst news:

A new batch of Abu Ghraib photos were published in Australia. So far I haven't been able to read anything on it. Servers overloaded?

In other news, had a nice time at the Clermont last night. BIB sang 'Du Hast' in German, I sang 'Cheney's Got a Gun' of course. MC was dressed up as cupid - white wings, Happy VD day arrows shoved down back of diaper and all. Highlight: drunk mexican screaming, 'Get out of my dreams and into my car,' which the MC aptly titled 'a soundtrack to an abduction.'

Got home just in time to catch 4 hours sleep. Due to an excess of zeal, I decided that today would be the first day I show up at work before 10:30 in, oh, a year. So I scheduled an 8 and 9:45AM meetings back to back. And you know what? Nobody else showed! Such are mornings in academia... I guess I haven't been missing out on much.

2.14.2006

Happy Valentines Day


2/14/06 CNN: The fellow hunter shot and wounded by Vice President Cheney suffered a "minor heart attack" after a piece of birdshot moved to his heart, a hospital spokesman said today. "Some of the bird shot appears to have moved and lodged into part of his heart ... in what we would say is a minor heart attack," said Peter Banko, with Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi-Memorial.

In other news, I cruised through the first few days of February in calculated silence, safe in the knowledge that the boy would completely forget VDay was coming, and then the two of us could get out of this stupid holiday altogether. Then my friend J had the audacity to mention the impending deadline to the two of us. The boy pulled a brilliant tactical move, announcing that, "I did Valentines Day last year and this year I think its your turn."

What a crock. My turn to do Valentines Day? What am I supposed to do for Valentines Day? All I've ever had to do is dress nice and show up. Dress nice, show up. Thats what I do for Valentine's Day. Grrrrr. And now, having had no practice at all, I have to organize stuff and do something thoughtful and what gives???? I have no clue what to do. I already did a big art piece for the boys b-day and I don't have the time or $ to top that... in fact I have no $ on account of She-Ra's mystery fever and expensive emergency vet trip two weeks ago. The boy hasn't bothered to cultivate a taste in chocolate over the years to make it easy on significant others, nor does he seem to appreciate flowers... I tried to do a silk screen t-shirt, but couldn't think of a good icon - its just - a disaster. Its 3PM on Valentines Day and I've got nothing.

Well, guess what. Its Tuesday so we're going to the Claremont for strip-club karaoke and that isn't romantic, I don't know what is. My turn to do Valentines Day, why I oughta...

2.13.2006

Cheneys Got a Gun...

Very funny stuff from the press gaggle today with McClellan.

2.11.2006

Coretta Scott King

Last week, Coretta Scott King passed away.

Its been hard for me to know what to say. Her funeral was loudly discussed on cable television.

It is a tribute to the first lady of the Civil Rights movement that a memorial of her life publicly shamed the most powerful man in the world.

But George W. Bush's shame is a side story. Last week, Atlanta took the day off, got on the bus after work, waited in line, braved the cold, with gratitude, sorrow and awe, to pay their respects to Mrs. King. Quietly, Atlanta concluded the first chapter of a movement that, in an everyday fashion, lives on.

2.10.2006

SB 529 Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act


Well, little news item yesterday: Chip Rogers introduced Senate Bill 529, the Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act.

As I understand, immigration is the wedge issue of the next election cycle, (although gay marriage never gets old...)

The bill does a couple of things:

1. denies public benefits to adults in the country illegally (I believe mothers and infants are exempted) and requires anyone arrested to prove their legal status; those who do not would be reported to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

2. require public contractors to hire only workers lawfully in the country.

Both of these have been on the radar.

The unexpected bits:

- Prohibits all employers from claiming wages paid to workers as a state income tax deduction unless those workers have documented they are here legally.
- does not force employers to enroll in a free federal program that runs background checks on workers' legal status.

And, theres a 25 year sentence for human traffickers, which is a nice touch I guess.

Illegal immigrants in Georgia range from 250,000 to 800,000. And this is GA there is the nativist fervor here you might expect... talk of 'invading our borders' and 'speak English' and 'illegal is ILLEGAL.' But theres also a sensible, working class thread to it: a feeling that illegals somehow underpin legal workers wages; are difficult to integrate into the community; and a resentment of big business. Zogby polled GA recently and reports that about 80 thought employers who hire illegal workers should be punished. 82 percent said the Legislature should take on the immigration issue. Time reports similar feelings nationwide: 63 percent said illegal immigration is an "extremely" or "very" serious problem and 74 percent said the government is not doing enough to curb illegal immigration.

I think most people see this as an economic/wage issue, framed as a nativist one with a sprinkling of national security and law-and-order, so that racists and authoritarians get energized to the polls. But still, the broad based appeal is as an economic/wage issue. And I wish I could say that the democrats in GA had a better way to tackle the economic issue, but they don't. The democrats in GA have always been beholden to the large rural farmers, and minimum wage remains where they left it: $5.15 an hour. So I don't have a sense that either party in GA offers positive solutions to wage issues.

All in all, I guess the devil is in the details and those will come out over the next few weeks. I haven't seen small businesses chip in and thats a surprise because while Vidalia onions might survive a crackdown on illegal immigration, I can't imagine that small contractors will. But I think its a good bill. It focuses primarily on the demand side of the equation - and with GOP controlling all three branches of government at the federal and state levels, what more can one expect?

- Ms. Bling

http://atlanta.bizjournals.com/atlanta/stories/2006/01/09/story2.html

http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/0210immigration.html

2.04.2006

Roll Call: GA 3rd a tossup...

3rd District
Incumbent: Jim Marshall (D)
2nd term (63 percent)
Outlook: Tossup
Marshall currently represents the south-central 3rd district, but under a newly approved Congressional map he will be running for re-election in a renumbered and reconfigured seat. Next year, he will face former Rep. Mac Collins (R), who represented portions of this redrawn district until he lost a GOP Senate primary last year. Collins’ primary performance was disappointing to say the least. His fundraising was lackluster, he was never able to gain traction and he finished a distant third in the contest. But Republicans say Collins learned from that experience, and that he is campaigning and fundraising with a renewed enthusiasm this time around. He is a strong retail politician, they say, an attribute that is better suited to a House district than a statewide run. Marshall, however, has proved to be a difficult target. After narrowly winning the seat in 2002, he defeated the same Republican opponent in 2004 with 63 percent of the vote, running well ahead of President Bush, who won 55 percent. Marshall is a Vietnam veteran and has compiled a fairly moderate voting record in his three years in the House. Under the new lines, however, Bush would have won 57 percent, and the black population of the district has been diminished. Republicans estimate that the new district is made up of one-third territory represented by Marshall, one-third territory formerly represented by Collins and one-third new territory to both. The GOP has a strong track record of winning open and competitive seats in Georgia in recent years, as a political realignment swept the party into power in 2002 for the first time since Reconstruction. But that same year, Marshall emerged as one of the few Democratic bright spots, winning the home district of the two Republicans at the top of the ticket (now-Gov. Sonny Perdue and now-Sen. Saxby Chambliss). The district is considered cheap as far as media markets go, so look for both parties and interest groups to spend heavily on each candidate’s behalf.

Reed losing GOP support in race for Lt. Governor...

AP...

"On Friday, 21 of Georgia's 34 Republican state senators all Cagle supporters signed a letter urging Reed to withdraw from the race, saying his involvement in the Abramoff scandal "threatens to impact the entire Republican ticket."

Reed responded in a letter that he had no plans to quit: "Elections are won at the grassroots by the candidate with the strongest record and best ideas. That is why I am confident of victory."

...

In a poll conducted for The Atlanta Journal-Constitution in late December, voters were asked about hypothetical match-ups between Reed and an unnamed Democrat, and Cagle and an unnamed Democrat. In the race involving Reed, 36 percent chose the Democrat and 33 percent picked Reed. As for the Cagle race, 35 percent preferred the lesser-known lawmaker, while 30 percent choose the Democrat."

My two cents: I think Reed is the easier target to beat. It would be nice if he won the republican primary - or at least blew through most of the GOP donations - before the scandal blows up.

2.03.2006

Addicted to Oil

A lot of folks I know or read were irritated last month over the Oprah-Frey flap. I read, and heard, variations on the theme of 'what is the big deal?' about 50 times after smoking gun revealed that bestselling memoirist James Frey is at best, a writer of fiction, and at worst, a big, fat liar.

As an 'is it a memoir' debate, BIB thought the Frey flap was authenticity lite. A real, academic examination of the issue (BIB was having a snobby moment) would focus on something like Binjamin Wilkomirshi's similarly titled, 'Fragments,' a memoir of dubious veracity retelling Wilkomirshi's childhood experiences in a concentration camp.

Similar to BIB, Andrew Sullivan started looking for the 'original Frey' - in his case, Robinson Crusoe. Christine Bauman took the 'Fake but Accurate' stance - and blamed the publishing industry for recasting a fictional tale as memoir in order to sell more books. Oprah, intimately familiar with the publishing industry, took a similar stance. Her first response, here excerpted from Larry King live, was that, " the underlying message of redemption in James Frey's memoir still resonates with me and I know that it resonates with millions of other people who have read this book and will continue to read this book...to me this is much ado about nothing..."

But the public didn't follow that particular fork in the path, and in the end, neither could Oprah. The question of whether the locus of truth is equally present, but falls differently based on where the line of authenticity is drawn, never satisfied the question because that wasn't the issue. What, then, was the issue?

My read of the Frey-Oprah kerfluffle is an allegory for America's growing mistrust of George Bush, not a literary discussion of authenticity and memoir. The alteration to the broadly held belief that Bush is a straight-talking Texan is following the narrative structure of the dry-drunk. A Michele Malkin reader sums up the dry-drunk narrative nicely:
"Among the worst facets of Oprah's "fake but accurate" defense is this: recovery requires HONESTY. Until a person can be honest about what they were and what they are, they are still addicts. This book is a pattern for a failed, incomplete recovery; written by a still-lying addict and promoted by a huckster who uses America's hunger for authenticity to enrich herself."
Its just a hunch I have - that this national discussion about addiction and lies in some way alters the collective neural pathways to and from our honesty-challenged president, George W. Bush. I was happy to see today that the (liberal) media response (copied and culled from Froomkin's helpful summary here) to the second Oprah-Frey interview seems to confirm what my gut says:
  1. Norman Solomon wrote in Huffingtonpost.com on Sunday: "During the 'Oprah' show, while lecturing a powerful book-publishing executive who had served as an enabler for the author's mendacity, Winfrey declared: 'That needs to change.' But what about the powerful news-media executives who keep enabling the president's mendacity?"
  2. Eugene Robinson wrote in his Washington Post opinion column on Tuesday: "If there were justice in the world, George W. Bush would have to give his State of the Union address from Oprah's couch."
  3. Here's cartoonist Mike Luckovich on Monday, imagining just such a scenario.
  4. Margaret Carlson wrote in her Bloomberg opinion column Thursday: "What a waste of Oprah's time exposing the likes of James Frey when there are so many government liars who need exposing. To cite one not-so-trivial example: If we had to pick one person to interview the president, and the choice was between Oprah and the New York Times editor who approved all those stories about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, I'd choose Oprah any day."
  5. Here, from the Crooks and Liars blog, is a video clip from Jon Stewart's show Monday night, which juxtaposes Oprah skewering Frey, and a softball interview with Dick Cheney.
  6. Greg Mitchell wrote a column Wednesday in Editor and Publisher, imagining Bush in the Frey role.
The highly anticpiated, much quoted 'Addicted to Oil' confession in last week's SOTU was the news media's biggest takeaway line from the speech (sorry, human-animal hybrids). Andrew Sullivan has already started to formulate a response. I'm curious to see where it goes.

2006: all new scandals...

So... it turns out that a friend known here as 'Umbrella' never stopped cheating on his girlfriend Allycat!

And all this time, I thought he'd turned over a new leaf - when he was just a conniving James Frey to my - well, I guess there is no Oprah in this story. Just Frey.

2.02.2006

Kids these days...


The Cuddle Puddle of Stuyvesant High

Researchers find it shocking that 11 percent of American girls between 15 and 19 claim to have same-sex encounters. Clearly they’ve never observed the social rituals of the pansexual, bi-queer, metroflexible New York teen...


Vote Fraud...

from the Corner and Roll Call...

In the election to decide who will replace Tom Delay and bring reform, transparency and accountability to congress, House Republicans took a mulligan on the first ballot.

The first count showed more votes cast than Republicans present at the Conference meeting.

Oh, thats so funny.

Sounds like a case for Voter ID...


2.01.2006

2006: all new scandals...


Z, leader of the 'Rotten' crew last year, (which threw a supercool, super successful benefit for 'Art in the Park') apparently finagled his way into getting half of the profits.

We're not talking about a whole lot of money - but given that:
  1. Z was board member of the nonprofit, and...
  2. the Rotten fundraiser was a labor of love (not a labor for Z) ...
most of the friends/volunteers who made it happen feel a little betrayed. Or burned. Or - like me - scandalized!!!

BIB tried to sound out Z via e-mail to get his side of the story, and as it turns out, feelings of betrayal are mutual:

Z wrote:
CC: Art in the Park
From: Z
Subject: Re: art in the park, last year's rotten proceeds
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:37:58 +0100
To: "BIB"


BIB,

This is clearly just a case of you and Ms. Bling in the ATL trying to stir up trouble for your own reasons.

Little snakes in the grass.

Whatever.

I will be sure to stay far away from you both and advise others of the same.

Enjoy your fun, whatever turns you on.

Kiss off.

z

Yowzah! Scottie McClellan to BIB's Helen Thomas, thats what I say!

Scandaliciously yours,

Ms. Snakes in the Grass in the ATL

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?